<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safety is Overrated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/02/20/safety-is-overrated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/02/20/safety-is-overrated/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 22:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/02/20/safety-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrago.com/blog/?p=41#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Okay, so I got so carried away with my last comment that I forgot to address the latter parts of the post. It&#039;s not that I care more about civil liberties than I do about Creative Commons, because I don&#039;t. I just get so excited about being a fuckpuppet for the government that I forget that other things matter too.

Creative Commons, indeed, is the shizzy for rizzy. Now, while that is a superlative I bestow on quite a few things that pleasantly surprise me with their innovation, it happens to hold alot of water for CC. Their stance on moderation in IP rights is something fresh and necessary for the creative types. Just knowing that Creative Commons is there to help and protect me makes me want to share with everyone. Efforts such as this, I think, will spark similar fits of media freedom. With this and my new found knowledge of self-publishing via Amazon, I&#039;m very happy about the state of independent media deployment and distribution. Even if I don&#039;t publish something in this open venue, I&#039;m happy that it&#039;s there and available to others. Maybe, with some organization of thoughts, I&#039;ll have some ideas into material I&#039;d like to publish. I mean, I certainly try to generate a good deal of creativity across the gamut of media, but to actually deem something that I do as fit for dissemination to the public is a big step for me. In short, I&#039;m working on it.

A three hour block of information illustrative of String Theory doesn&#039;t seem so appealing to me, but I have taken a special effort to keep from buying the book, this video series&#039; namesake. This isn&#039;t because I don&#039;t want to read it, but because I have a few too many science texts that sit in my reading pile, waiting for me to attempt them. They give me a fair chance, but all too often I feel as though I&#039;ve disappointed Bryce, my quantum physicist friend, with my inability to process some of the information and retain the rest. I wish I were smarter... or at least not so lazy. Either of those might help me out in the long run. Regardless, I think your approval is the thing that will eventually relegate me to 180 minutes of awe from which, hopefully, I will emerge for a better understanding of Brian Greene&#039;s view of the universe.

Of course, your Coaster anecdote brings a smile to my face, as I am happy that you feel more confident about going to Guadec. It seems as though you take great joy in contributing to the OSS cause, and it gives me hope to see idealist behavior in any form. However, my interest in the story also relates to my own desire to be a part of something as innovative and helpful as the Open Source Movement. It really seems exceptional to be able to fix part of a program that you want to use and then have everyone adopt that fix. It&#039;s a wonderful sense of cooperation in an online environment where nothing of the sort existed. Soon, I&#039;d like to invest myself in seeing how I could help the open source community. I&#039;m sure there&#039;s something I can do.

Oh right... fuzzy. 
You&#039;re a prick for making me say that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I got so carried away with my last comment that I forgot to address the latter parts of the post. It&#8217;s not that I care more about civil liberties than I do about Creative Commons, because I don&#8217;t. I just get so excited about being a fuckpuppet for the government that I forget that other things matter too.</p>
<p>Creative Commons, indeed, is the shizzy for rizzy. Now, while that is a superlative I bestow on quite a few things that pleasantly surprise me with their innovation, it happens to hold alot of water for CC. Their stance on moderation in IP rights is something fresh and necessary for the creative types. Just knowing that Creative Commons is there to help and protect me makes me want to share with everyone. Efforts such as this, I think, will spark similar fits of media freedom. With this and my new found knowledge of self-publishing via Amazon, I&#8217;m very happy about the state of independent media deployment and distribution. Even if I don&#8217;t publish something in this open venue, I&#8217;m happy that it&#8217;s there and available to others. Maybe, with some organization of thoughts, I&#8217;ll have some ideas into material I&#8217;d like to publish. I mean, I certainly try to generate a good deal of creativity across the gamut of media, but to actually deem something that I do as fit for dissemination to the public is a big step for me. In short, I&#8217;m working on it.</p>
<p>A three hour block of information illustrative of String Theory doesn&#8217;t seem so appealing to me, but I have taken a special effort to keep from buying the book, this video series&#8217; namesake. This isn&#8217;t because I don&#8217;t want to read it, but because I have a few too many science texts that sit in my reading pile, waiting for me to attempt them. They give me a fair chance, but all too often I feel as though I&#8217;ve disappointed Bryce, my quantum physicist friend, with my inability to process some of the information and retain the rest. I wish I were smarter&#8230; or at least not so lazy. Either of those might help me out in the long run. Regardless, I think your approval is the thing that will eventually relegate me to 180 minutes of awe from which, hopefully, I will emerge for a better understanding of Brian Greene&#8217;s view of the universe.</p>
<p>Of course, your Coaster anecdote brings a smile to my face, as I am happy that you feel more confident about going to Guadec. It seems as though you take great joy in contributing to the OSS cause, and it gives me hope to see idealist behavior in any form. However, my interest in the story also relates to my own desire to be a part of something as innovative and helpful as the Open Source Movement. It really seems exceptional to be able to fix part of a program that you want to use and then have everyone adopt that fix. It&#8217;s a wonderful sense of cooperation in an online environment where nothing of the sort existed. Soon, I&#8217;d like to invest myself in seeing how I could help the open source community. I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s something I can do.</p>
<p>Oh right&#8230; fuzzy.<br />
You&#8217;re a prick for making me say that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsin</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/02/20/safety-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>jsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrago.com/blog/?p=41#comment-277</guid>
		<description>i just made out with a bear and now my tongue is all fuzzy
I actually skimmed your whole post and missed the meat of it but lets see how close i am to the mark.
The loss of Civil liberties and everything we take for granted in the united states as citizens is tragic. boo hoo
i really mean it though thats the sad thing. i too am scared shitless when i read an article(on slashdot this morning) about how a man in ohio gets an FBI raid just cuz he uncaps his modem. 
it freaking upset me. not that circumstance ....ok yes that circumstance... but also hundreds more that i hear about and take note of that are just plain scary and reek of a totalitarianism. But really what can i do about it ?
in the greater sense ...what am i gonna lobby? cmon give me a break....
the only read option left seems to be to move to canada
-jsin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just made out with a bear and now my tongue is all fuzzy<br />
I actually skimmed your whole post and missed the meat of it but lets see how close i am to the mark.<br />
The loss of Civil liberties and everything we take for granted in the united states as citizens is tragic. boo hoo<br />
i really mean it though thats the sad thing. i too am scared shitless when i read an article(on slashdot this morning) about how a man in ohio gets an FBI raid just cuz he uncaps his modem.<br />
it freaking upset me. not that circumstance &#8230;.ok yes that circumstance&#8230; but also hundreds more that i hear about and take note of that are just plain scary and reek of a totalitarianism. But really what can i do about it ?<br />
in the greater sense &#8230;what am i gonna lobby? cmon give me a break&#8230;.<br />
the only read option left seems to be to move to canada<br />
-jsin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/02/20/safety-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrago.com/blog/?p=41#comment-270</guid>
		<description>As the tides of the country&#039;s politics change, we are slowly giving up our civil liberties in exchange for increased protection from the alien attackers. Don&#039;t get me wrong, they&#039;re not being taken away... we&#039;re giving them up. It may not look like a police state, but it functions just as well. Between accelerating governmental regulation and an encouraged societal xenophobia, you&#039;ll soon not much more free than if you lived in China. The Chinese don&#039;t have it so bad, so long as they do as they&#039;re told and keep everything they do in public view and free of governmental criticism.

You don&#039;t have it so bad either. You hardly have the right to take responsibility for your own actions today. You certainly don&#039;t have a right to die, unless it&#039;s for your country, your rights to free speech mean little to nothing, especially when being fed into the freedom of the press, now nullified by the PATRIOT Act. Try protesting governmental actions, burning the flag or carrying a gun. Many peope don&#039;t even know that burning the American flag isn&#039;t illegal. Even more think that it should be. So why should you care about rights you don&#039;t even exercise? Just because it isn&#039;t illegal doesn&#039;t mean that you can&#039;t be branded a criminal in the court of public opinion. Who gives a fuck about public opinion? Legislators base their decisions, in part on the public opinion of their constituents, and the rest is based on financial contributions. But they can&#039;t continue to collect that money if they lose re-election, so the public opinion has a small part in the lawmaking process.

Where is this going? All this leads to a big sign that says, &quot;You Lose.&quot; Because of a mass apathy in this country, those that are both vocal and rich are the ones that&#039;re heard through laws and then obeyed through subsequent actions. If fear is an issue, then providing aggressive bills that offer safety through reduced rights just confirms, through faulty logic, that if we don&#039;t have more safety, then we have more to fear. This culture of fear, truly, is in everything from the ground up in this country, but since we gave the government the power to take away our power to give it power, then who&#039;s the one with the power now? Certainly not you or I.

So, police state, we&#039;re not, but if there were an awards show for most likely to become a police state, we&#039;d have already invaded the awards show on suspicion of supporting terrorism, executed the voting board and set up our own brand of flavorless democracy byproducts in it&#039;s place, just so we could be sure they&#039;d give the award to us. It&#039;s as hopeless as it gets in this defunct democracy, and with no hope of swaying either legisators or the populous, just engage, whole heartedly, in civil disobedience. If you take your rights into your own hands, you&#039;re just as patriotic as any of the founding fathers of this country. This what they were preparing us for with that Bill of Rights, this is the tyranny they forecasted with double doppler radar precision, and the government has stolen your Umbrella of Safety. Get ready for a downpour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the tides of the country&#8217;s politics change, we are slowly giving up our civil liberties in exchange for increased protection from the alien attackers. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, they&#8217;re not being taken away&#8230; we&#8217;re giving them up. It may not look like a police state, but it functions just as well. Between accelerating governmental regulation and an encouraged societal xenophobia, you&#8217;ll soon not much more free than if you lived in China. The Chinese don&#8217;t have it so bad, so long as they do as they&#8217;re told and keep everything they do in public view and free of governmental criticism.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have it so bad either. You hardly have the right to take responsibility for your own actions today. You certainly don&#8217;t have a right to die, unless it&#8217;s for your country, your rights to free speech mean little to nothing, especially when being fed into the freedom of the press, now nullified by the PATRIOT Act. Try protesting governmental actions, burning the flag or carrying a gun. Many peope don&#8217;t even know that burning the American flag isn&#8217;t illegal. Even more think that it should be. So why should you care about rights you don&#8217;t even exercise? Just because it isn&#8217;t illegal doesn&#8217;t mean that you can&#8217;t be branded a criminal in the court of public opinion. Who gives a fuck about public opinion? Legislators base their decisions, in part on the public opinion of their constituents, and the rest is based on financial contributions. But they can&#8217;t continue to collect that money if they lose re-election, so the public opinion has a small part in the lawmaking process.</p>
<p>Where is this going? All this leads to a big sign that says, &#8220;You Lose.&#8221; Because of a mass apathy in this country, those that are both vocal and rich are the ones that&#8217;re heard through laws and then obeyed through subsequent actions. If fear is an issue, then providing aggressive bills that offer safety through reduced rights just confirms, through faulty logic, that if we don&#8217;t have more safety, then we have more to fear. This culture of fear, truly, is in everything from the ground up in this country, but since we gave the government the power to take away our power to give it power, then who&#8217;s the one with the power now? Certainly not you or I.</p>
<p>So, police state, we&#8217;re not, but if there were an awards show for most likely to become a police state, we&#8217;d have already invaded the awards show on suspicion of supporting terrorism, executed the voting board and set up our own brand of flavorless democracy byproducts in it&#8217;s place, just so we could be sure they&#8217;d give the award to us. It&#8217;s as hopeless as it gets in this defunct democracy, and with no hope of swaying either legisators or the populous, just engage, whole heartedly, in civil disobedience. If you take your rights into your own hands, you&#8217;re just as patriotic as any of the founding fathers of this country. This what they were preparing us for with that Bill of Rights, this is the tyranny they forecasted with double doppler radar precision, and the government has stolen your Umbrella of Safety. Get ready for a downpour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/02/20/safety-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrago.com/blog/?p=41#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Your abso-freakin-loutely right. There are the aggressors and the pacifists and they are all vying for the public&#039;s attention. The pacifists call the aggressors &#039;warmongers&#039; and the aggressors claim that the pacifists are unaware of the real dangers that are out there in the world. They are not wrong, they are just misinformed.
We&#039;re way off from ever being in a police state. I don&#039;t think martial law well be declared any time soon. The thought of martial law reminds me of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133952/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Siege&lt;/a&gt;. The movie was lukewarm but a basic rundown of the plot is that after we deal a hit to the &quot;Terrorists&quot;, they fight back launching an all out assault on New York and martial law is declared to restore order. It plays out interestingly and is worth the watch, but this plot would never fly post 9-11, The movie came out in 1998.
I had also heard a comparison between the plotting of 9-11 and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116253/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Executive Decision&lt;/a&gt;. This movie really kinda sucked. The only good part about it was that Steven Segal died within the first 10 minutes. In the movie, terrorists hijack a plane and the good guys are sent to take them down. The thing is, this isn&#039;t an ordinary hijacking plot. The terrorists’ demands are only to keep people busy. The true intent was to detonate a biological agent on the plane and crash it, wiping out the eastern seaboard or something like that, it was a kamikaze mission. This was released in 1996.
Maybe life is stranger than fiction. That or both the bad guys and supposed good guys are out of ideas and are sifting through the VHS bin at Blockbuster on what to do next. I&#039;m going to go back to work and ride the rest of this out like a good little pawn. There is only one solution: Schwarzenegger for Prez.

Happy to be the filler in MeatSpace.
-John
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your abso-freakin-loutely right. There are the aggressors and the pacifists and they are all vying for the public&#8217;s attention. The pacifists call the aggressors &#8216;warmongers&#8217; and the aggressors claim that the pacifists are unaware of the real dangers that are out there in the world. They are not wrong, they are just misinformed.<br />
We&#8217;re way off from ever being in a police state. I don&#8217;t think martial law well be declared any time soon. The thought of martial law reminds me of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133952/" rel="nofollow">The Siege</a>. The movie was lukewarm but a basic rundown of the plot is that after we deal a hit to the &#8220;Terrorists&#8221;, they fight back launching an all out assault on New York and martial law is declared to restore order. It plays out interestingly and is worth the watch, but this plot would never fly post 9-11, The movie came out in 1998.<br />
I had also heard a comparison between the plotting of 9-11 and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116253/" rel="nofollow">Executive Decision</a>. This movie really kinda sucked. The only good part about it was that Steven Segal died within the first 10 minutes. In the movie, terrorists hijack a plane and the good guys are sent to take them down. The thing is, this isn&#8217;t an ordinary hijacking plot. The terrorists’ demands are only to keep people busy. The true intent was to detonate a biological agent on the plane and crash it, wiping out the eastern seaboard or something like that, it was a kamikaze mission. This was released in 1996.<br />
Maybe life is stranger than fiction. That or both the bad guys and supposed good guys are out of ideas and are sifting through the VHS bin at Blockbuster on what to do next. I&#8217;m going to go back to work and ride the rest of this out like a good little pawn. There is only one solution: Schwarzenegger for Prez.</p>
<p>Happy to be the filler in MeatSpace.<br />
-John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/02/20/safety-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrago.com/blog/?p=41#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Damn, I need a drink after reading that whole thing.  And not one of those girly drinks like a fuzzy navel, either; a good stiff Scotch or something.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I need a drink after reading that whole thing.  And not one of those girly drinks like a fuzzy navel, either; a good stiff Scotch or something.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/02/20/safety-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrago.com/blog/?p=41#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Mark Drago, it&#039;s been years, but you are more brilliant than I had any idea.  Knowing that someone else out there might actually share the same philosophical (as ridiculous as they may be sometimes) opinions as myself makes me feel all kinds of warm &amp; fuzzy inside.

I just stumbled onto your blog tonight, but trust me, this is a place I will frequent, so keep it up!

All my best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Drago, it&#8217;s been years, but you are more brilliant than I had any idea.  Knowing that someone else out there might actually share the same philosophical (as ridiculous as they may be sometimes) opinions as myself makes me feel all kinds of warm &amp; fuzzy inside.</p>
<p>I just stumbled onto your blog tonight, but trust me, this is a place I will frequent, so keep it up!</p>
<p>All my best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
