<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wobbly Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/03/24/wobbly-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/03/24/wobbly-windows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 22:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/03/24/wobbly-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrago.com/blog/?p=45#comment-540</guid>
		<description>You know, I almost let all of these cracks about Stardock doing this first and about how I had to compile stuff just slide right by.  But, I just can&#039;t.  I don&#039;t _have_ to compile anything.  I just have the option of compiling stuff when it isn&#039;t even released yet.  I had to check the wobbly windows stuff out of CVS because it is just that new.  Hell, I could submit a patch to it and get it included in the real version before people who don&#039;t compile anything even see the end result.  The one compelling reason I have to compile something is to get my hands on code that is less than a day old.  :o)

I&#039;m pretty psyched that this stuff will be out before Longhorn.  This stuff is slated for release in Fedora Core 5 which will come out by the end of this year.  Apple _has_ been doing this stuff for years of course, but that&#039;s the way things tend to go with Apple.  They do something years before everyone else and it only really takes off when MS does it.  It&#039;s a shame really.

I wouldn&#039;t feel bad about using a Mac OSX machine.  Hell, I would use a Mac OSX machine before I ever use a Windows machine again.  So, tell your work buddy that he&#039;s just a mac-a-phobe.  :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I almost let all of these cracks about Stardock doing this first and about how I had to compile stuff just slide right by.  But, I just can&#8217;t.  I don&#8217;t _have_ to compile anything.  I just have the option of compiling stuff when it isn&#8217;t even released yet.  I had to check the wobbly windows stuff out of CVS because it is just that new.  Hell, I could submit a patch to it and get it included in the real version before people who don&#8217;t compile anything even see the end result.  The one compelling reason I have to compile something is to get my hands on code that is less than a day old.  :o)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty psyched that this stuff will be out before Longhorn.  This stuff is slated for release in Fedora Core 5 which will come out by the end of this year.  Apple _has_ been doing this stuff for years of course, but that&#8217;s the way things tend to go with Apple.  They do something years before everyone else and it only really takes off when MS does it.  It&#8217;s a shame really.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t feel bad about using a Mac OSX machine.  Hell, I would use a Mac OSX machine before I ever use a Windows machine again.  So, tell your work buddy that he&#8217;s just a mac-a-phobe.  :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrago.com/blog/2005/03/24/wobbly-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrago.com/blog/?p=45#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Wow... Wobbly Windows. That was cool when stardock pimped that 2 years ago with WindowFX + WindowBlinds. Course, I didn&#039;t have to complie shit, Hell I didn&#039;t even have to pay for it. I but I see as far as eye candy goes, the Linux desktop is getting there. I always though that Gnome was way sexier than any XP desktop could be. I think that it&#039;s awesome that the Linux desktop with have 3D acceleration in place before schLonghorn even gets out the door.

Course... OSX has been around how long now?

Oh yeah, I got an iBook. PearPC too slow and CherryOS too stolen. Been having fun with the packages from &lt;a href=&quot;http://fink.sourceforge.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fink&lt;/a&gt;. The allure of the mac is 99% applications, 1% hardware. The hardware is a joke, but it&#039;s enough to make everything you run on it look pretty. A friend at work got all high an mighty that I&#039;m switching. I told him to fuck off, if anything I&#039;m platform bi. I&#039;m all for the PC, but occasionally I get drunk, get in to the wrong bed and let the mac suck me off ^_^.
For a scenario, we did a comparison. The challenge: to go from DVD to ISO MPEG 4. It takes my home machine (AMD64 3200, 1GB Ram) 1 hours, 45 minutes at high quality. It took his Dual G5 (2x1.6GHx, 2GB Ram) 6 hours to do the same clip. Apparently XCode &amp; AltiVec optimizations sound great on paper, but it didn&#039;t work out so well. But I have to say... The windows too look pretty and bright on under OS X and expose makes me cream my pants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; Wobbly Windows. That was cool when stardock pimped that 2 years ago with WindowFX + WindowBlinds. Course, I didn&#8217;t have to complie shit, Hell I didn&#8217;t even have to pay for it. I but I see as far as eye candy goes, the Linux desktop is getting there. I always though that Gnome was way sexier than any XP desktop could be. I think that it&#8217;s awesome that the Linux desktop with have 3D acceleration in place before schLonghorn even gets out the door.</p>
<p>Course&#8230; OSX has been around how long now?</p>
<p>Oh yeah, I got an iBook. PearPC too slow and CherryOS too stolen. Been having fun with the packages from <a href="http://fink.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">Fink</a>. The allure of the mac is 99% applications, 1% hardware. The hardware is a joke, but it&#8217;s enough to make everything you run on it look pretty. A friend at work got all high an mighty that I&#8217;m switching. I told him to fuck off, if anything I&#8217;m platform bi. I&#8217;m all for the PC, but occasionally I get drunk, get in to the wrong bed and let the mac suck me off ^_^.<br />
For a scenario, we did a comparison. The challenge: to go from DVD to ISO MPEG 4. It takes my home machine (AMD64 3200, 1GB Ram) 1 hours, 45 minutes at high quality. It took his Dual G5 (2&#215;1.6GHx, 2GB Ram) 6 hours to do the same clip. Apparently XCode &amp; AltiVec optimizations sound great on paper, but it didn&#8217;t work out so well. But I have to say&#8230; The windows too look pretty and bright on under OS X and expose makes me cream my pants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
